Raphinha can make the team better, to make the team make Raphinha better: Bielsa before Spurs - The Square Ball 19/11/21
HAIR ON YOUR CHEST
Written by Moscowhite • Daniel Chapman
It’s Friday before Sunday at Spurs, time for the press to
assemble with strong pliers and big boots, put Marcelo Bielsa in the chair, and
get to tugging the deep-rooted tooth of injury news out from the concretised
gums of the boss. ‘It’s subject’ — 1-2-3! — ‘to the’ — PULL! — ‘evolution’ —
HEAVE!
In the end they got some success, but as always it’s the
players you don’t ask about who surprise you with their absence come game day.
I propose reading out a squad list and making Bielsa answer sí o no to each
one, but for now anxious Fantasy Premier League managers will have to take
their risks with the rest of us.
Here’s what we learned. Pat Bamford and Luke Ayling won’t
play against Spurs. They are “progressing positively” and their “evolution” —
DRINK! — is “controlled daily” so Bielsa wouldn’t like to put a timeframe on
their return. Junior Firpo is “evolving” — SHOTS! — and “healthy” — he just
needs minutes for match fitness. Jamie Shackleton is the same as Firpo, at “the
end of his recovery”, while all we got on Joffy Gelhardt is that he’d probably
play for the Under-23s against Chelsea today (he’s starting on the bench).
Don’t forget Robin Koch! He’s “further away” than Ayling and Bamford. I prefer
this comparative method to the evolution rubric and would like to hear Bielsa
expand on this in future: Shackleton is nearer than Ayling but further than
Firpo, Gelhardt is nearer than Firpo but not as close as Shackleton. Or maybe
get the Guess Who? boards out. Does the injured player have a moustache,
Marcelo?
Otherwise there was a lot about Antonio Conte, the new Spurs
manager, a job that like Steven Gerrard at Villa I think we’re all regarding as
his stepping stone towards one day managing Leeds. Bielsa, deeply influenced by
legendary Italian coach Arrigo Sacchi, put Conte in that lineage when he said
he’s, “A genuine representative of his country in terms of managers, who has
triumphed in every team he’s managed. He’s a reference in world football … who
obtains very, very high performances from his players.”
The key characteristics of Conte’s teams are, “Intensity,
collective sense. They attack with a lot of players but that doesn’t mean they
defend with less,” and vice versa. That, says Bielsa, is very difficult to
achieve, and that signifies how great Conte is. Marcelo didn’t seem to dig the
idea when asked if Conte is an ‘innovator’, because there isn’t really any
innovating going on in football. “The word innovative presupposes applying
procedures, or how to achieve goals, and aesthetics within a team, in the way
of playing and the style of play. In that sense it is very difficult to create
things that have not happened before.”
Rather than innovation, what marks coaches like Conte is,
“They manage to extract from the virtues of the players they train, because
that demands how you prepare them and to convince them.” This has parallels
with the way Bielsa has described his own work, of finding pre-existing
qualities in players and convincing them that by believing in his ideas they
will make full use of their virtues. To Bielsa, “I believe that in those two
aspects, to convince and prepare them, Conte is a master.”
Are Conte and Bielsa comparable, then? Bielsa’s humility
won’t allow much of that kind of talk. “It is enough to review the achievements
of one and the other to clearly see the differences,” he said, a reminder of
his first season when he gently corrected an interviewer who suggested he had a
track record of winning. “I thank you for the generosity of your concept,” he
said back then, “But people would have found out the truth very easily.”
The day’s other theme was Raphina, although nobody came
straight out and asked him about Nicolas Otamendi smashing him in the face.
Instead we got vague sort of queries around how good he can be and how he can
deal with ‘attention’, a weak euphemism for a forearm swinging hard at your
jaw. Maybe people were cautious about the Argentina versus Brazil thing, I
dunno. Anyway, this section did elicit a neat summary of how to get the best
from players like Raphinha, who can ‘unbalance’ opponents.
“More than what I do is what the player does,” and what his
teammates do, says Bielsa. Players who can “unbalance individually” have an
awareness of the different things they can do with different kinds of passes
from their buddies. “What is most convenient for them is to receive a lot of
balls, far away from their markers, receiving the ball in motion rather than
standing still, and in places the opponent does not expect. No player that
unbalances ignores how to solve all these needs, that allow them to get hold of
the ball in good conditions.”
In other words, in a match, the way dangerous players like
Raphinha get the ball is more important than their skill at beating players.
Next time you see Raphinha glaring murderously at Jamie Shackleton for giving
him a square ball in a crowd on halfway, now you know how come. And this anger
is in fact vital to Raphinha’s improvement, and Leeds United’s improvement, as
Bielsa explained off on a tangent when asked how much better Raphinha can
become.
First:
“He is sufficiently good right now.”
That’s sufficiently good for me. We could have left it right
there!
“If you ask me how I imagine the growth and evolution” —
SALUT! — “of the player, I would say that regularly maintaining performances
like the ones he manages would be a great indicator. And the other great
challenge to the players who stand out is to transfer that evolution” — PROST!
— “to the teammates and the team. Raphinha will be much better if the team is
better and if his teammates are better.”
I’m wary of this paragraph, because its last line could
easily finish ‘…so we’re selling him to Liverpool to play with better
teammates.’ But that’s not what he means! Thank fu—
“This is normal, what I say is not my own conclusion, but an
observation that emerges from the reality of players who stand out. They start
by unbalancing [opponents] by themselves, then they achieve that the teammates
manage to facilitate the actions of their teammates with their assistance. And
it is this development of the collective game that improves the team they
belong to, and that process is a great challenge.”
Phew, okay, this is better. It’s back to shouting at
Shackleton. A player as good as Raphinha will evolve — oh god, SLÁINTE — by
educating the team around him to get the best out of him. The first few times
training down the wing Shacks might have looked at Raphinha and despaired of
this demanding menace asking him to give him the ball in ways that Helder Costa
did never. But if the players can overcome the “great challenge” Bielsa talks
about, Shackleton will learn how to give Raphinha the ball just how he likes
it, and become a better player in the process. And it isn’t Shackleton alone getting
the brunt of Raphinha’s demands for right passes, but the whole team, so they
should all be getting better at helping him, so good, in fact, that with these
players Leeds will win the Champions League and we’ll never have to sell
Raphinha.
That’s the theory, anyway!