Leeds United referee and VAR anger vindicated as Premier League panel weighs in on controversy — YEP 17/3/26
By Graham Smyth
Daniel Farke labelled the incident ‘crazy’ following Leeds
United’s defeat to Sunderland.
Daniel Farke's anger at the officiating of Leeds United's
defeat by Sunderland has been vindicated by the Premier League's Key Match
Incidents [KMI] Panel.
Farke was aggrieved that Leeds were denied a spot-kick in
the first half when Luke O'Nien grabbed Pascal Struijk around the neck, with
the Whites defender going to the ground in the box. Struijk appealed but
referee Stuart Attwell allowed play to go on and VAR did not intervene.
The KMI panel has voted unanimously to say the officials got
it wrong. As reported by the BBC, the panel noted that Sunderland skipper
O'Nien is 'not looking at the ball, places his arms around the neck of Struijk
in a clear non-footballing action and stops the Leeds United attacker from
progressing towards goal.’
Farke described it as a 'crazy' decision in his post-game
press conference. Officiating has become a recurring theme in the Leeds
manager's meetings with the media of late.
He was angered by the lack of penalty for an apparent
handball in the game against Man City, when he was sent off at full-time for
jogging onto the pitch to ask referee Peter Bankes why he had blown up so soon
after the minimum stoppage time was played. At Crystal Palace on Sunday Farke
was frustrated with Gabriel Gudmundsson's sending off by referee Thomas Bramall
for a second bookable offence, the German insisting his defender's challenge
was 'never' a yellow card.
Later in the game Brennan Johnson escaped a second yellow
for a foul on James Justin that Farke deemed 'worse' than Gudmundsson's.