How Can Marcelo Bielsa’s Friends Think He Talks Too Much? - The Square Ball 27/8/21
SO MANY WORDS
Written by Moscowhite • Daniel Chapman
There he is, the Wetherby pub bore, sitting in the corner
all night, splitting one pint into two glasses with his yawning mate, while the
landlord tuts and calculates takings per hour for his table. More drinking and
less yakking would get the till ringing, but it doesn’t take much to set this
bloke off. Just two Leeds fans at a nearby table, one saying to the other, ‘You
see Raphinha got called up for Brazil? Good player, him.’
Aw hell’s bells, here we go, he’s off now isn’t he:
“He’s a very potent player and it’s very difficult to
triumph in the Premier League if you don’t have this potency. This
explosiveness and repetitions, quick physical responses. On top of that he
sustains the efforts of any problems but players in those conditions, there are
many in the Premier League. What there are very few players of, is the players
of his talent with his feet to resolve a situation. Apart from that, being able
to imagine the responses and be able to actually do them also.”
Yeah, so, like they said: good player, Raphinha. The thing
is, Marcelo Bielsa, for he is this bore in the corner, seems to be aware of how
his monologues go down:
“If I were with my friends, they would say, ‘so many words
just to say that he plays well.’”
But can that really be true? Replace that imaginary scene
above with another one. If, in a pub in Wetherby, two Leeds fans were idly
chatting about Raphinha, and then actual Marcelo Bielsa himself politely
offered an opinion from the corner table where he was writing tactical plans
with his assistants, would those fans end up thinking, ‘Jeez, this bloke goes
on a bit, doesn’t he?’ No, they would not. They would hardly be able to breathe
despite their brains’ desperation for oxygen to help them imprint every moment
spent in Bielsa’s presence so deeply into the best memories of their lives that
the marrying of spouses and births of children were elbowed out. When he
finished speaking, they would stay silent in the hope he might continue. After
an appropriate pause, they might dare to encourage him to speak more, urging a
few additional words on any subject they can think of, praying they can prolong
the interaction without being disrespectful of this great person’s precious
time.
So I guess the question is, what’s up with Marcelo’s
friends, then, if they think he talks too much? We know this opinion from his
enemies, who think all his blather is just ‘selling smoke’. But can he really
have tired his friends out to the point they roll eyes and swap glances when he
goes forth, multiplying their understanding of the game if only they’d stop
fiddling with their phones? ‘Yeah, I guess so, Marcelo. Anyway, anybody see
Emmerdale?’
What about his family? Surely his wife Laura Bracalenti, the
architect, is given ample room in any discussion with her husband to share her
ideas about urban agriculture as much as he discusses football with her. Unless
he can’t help it? Many of us, after months indoors due to the pandemic, have
been spilling words like water from a full jug since we’ve been back in
society. Perhaps Bielsa is the same, and when he and his family are reunited
after sometimes months apart, once the kids have talked up their hockey
achievements, they fall silent for an hour or two to hear a lecture on Luke
Ayling’s adaptation to a new throw-in technique? Bielsa once spent months in a
convent, recovering from the monumental defeats football kept inflicting on
him, only emerging when he felt his own company was beginning to drive him mad.
Imagine being the first person to greet him after that retreat. They might have
thought this madman would never stop talking. ‘So what you’re saying is,
Marcelo,’ they might interrupt in a breath-long pause after a night’s talk has
run on into breakfast, ‘Maradona was a good player?’
Bielsa’s life’s work has been about communicating ideas. But
sometimes, when he catches himself speaking at length, it’s a reminder that
most of what you need to know of this thoughts can be seen on football pitches.
But that doesn’t mean, beyond his self-deprecation, we wouldn’t all gladly
listen to Bielsa talking football all day. So here’s his pre-Burnley press
conference on LUTV or in Leeds Live’s transcript. After Raphinha, there’s a lot
of talk about our other new international call-up, Pat Bamford. How much credit
do you think Bielsa is taking for helping Bamford make it into the England
squad?
“If I thought I had merit in it, I would tell you.
Sincerely, I see everything from the inside but I feel it’s what he’s done to
make him evolve and resulted in him being called up.”
What Bamford has done, in Bielsa’s view, is “improved his
range of efficiency”, or to put it another way, ‘stopped missing all the
chances our tactics put on a plate for him’:
“There are centre-forwards who have very few chances at
goal, and there are forwards who have plenty of chances. Bamford usually has
chances during the games, and for him to have improved his range of efficiency
has been an important step.”
Bielsa even ended up inverting the story of our win over
Crewe, saying that while Bamford was important to the final score, the rest of
the team had already done enough to deserve the win:
“The opposition were tired when he came on. The fundamental
difference in the last ten minutes of the game [was that] Leeds scored three
goals. But in the first eighty minutes, we created fifteen chances … Phillips
had had a prior chance from a set-piece, as easy as the one that he scored.
Rodrigo had some clear chances at goal too, and Tyler [Roberts] had clear
chances, and the rest of the team shared chances also. To summarise, Bamford
was very important, but what the rest of the team facilitated, what they did
was also important.”
This was answering a question about whether the team could
be over-reliant on Bamford, so it’s probably more to give credit to the rest of
the team that Bielsa is implying we hardly needed him at all against Crewe.
So what, then, about the other player who had ‘some clear
chances’ but didn’t score? Bielsa’s assessment of Rodrigo was even longer than
that of Raphinha, and partially obscured by the noise of someone hoovering in
the background (never change, Leeds). The key points are, Rodrigo is ace, his
influence on the team is “less than we expected”, but that’s not his fault:
“Rodrigo is a player with all the faculties to triumph at
Leeds and in English football. His football and technical resources can’t be
better. His physical responses are one of the best in the team. He’s a very
serious professional, very dedicated and very conscientious.
“In a parallel way, he’s had an important influence on the
team, less than we expected, and when it’s about a player like Rodrigo, that
doesn’t have aspects [problems] to correct … [all that’s left to do is] about
me putting him in the team, and [him] having a higher repercussion in the team
than he is currently having. I sincerely exempt him from any responsibility
[for his lower influence] because in every game, every training session, he is
impeccable … [any manager] would want him to triumph in their team.”
Lad’s just got to keep working hard in training, where he’s
an example to the rest of the lads, and at the end of the day when he gets his
rewards on the pitch Bielsa will be over the moon.
We’ll end with one of the most interesting parts of Bielsa’s
talk today, as fans of the two Manchester clubs take turns buying and burning
shirts with Cristiano Ronaldo’s name on the back. He was asked if fans place
too much value on transfer news, and whether it’s an entirely media driven
phenomenon. Bielsa’s says he can’t judge whether those are accurate statements,
but:
“The transfer of a player normally indicates a team gets a
signing that elevates their level, and this increases the hopes of the fans.
Apart from that, it’s one of the aspects of information that has a lot of
repercussion, where you can say a lot of things even if they are not true. It’s
a scenario that is very attractive for the media companies.”
Not only one of his most interesting comments, but one of
his most concise.